DroneHub

BVLOS NPRM: Comment Period Reopened (Electronic Conspicuity & Right-of-Way)

Proposed rule (NPRM) · published 2026-01-28 · comments close 2026-02-11
Read the official document (2026-01644)

Nothing changes for you. This is a procedural reopening of a comment window, not a rule change.

Who this affects

No one's operations change. Anyone wanting to submit additional comments on electronic conspicuity or right-of-way in the BVLOS rulemaking has a new window to do so.

What the document says

FAA is reopening the comment period for the NPRM 'Normalizing Unmanned Aircraft Systems Beyond Visual Line of Sight Operations' (originally published August 7, 2025). The reopening is specifically to solicit additional comments on two topics: electronic conspicuity and right-of-way. The docket is FAA-2025-1908 (the notice itself misprints it as FAA-FAA-2025-1908). The comment period closes February 11, 2026.

What changes in practice

Nothing. This is not a final rule, not an amendment, not an emergency action. It is a procedural step that extends the window for public input on two specific topics within a proposed rule that has not yet been finalized.

What it does not do

It does not authorize BVLOS operations. It does not change any existing Part 107 requirement. It does not create new waiver criteria. It does not define what electronic conspicuity or right-of-way rules will look like. It does not close the docket or signal imminent finalization. It is a single procedural notice within a larger rulemaking that is still in the proposal stage.

Does this affect the Part 107 exam?

No. This does not affect the Part 107 exam. The exam tests current regulations. This document is a procedural step in a proposed rule that, if it ever becomes final, would likely fall outside the scope of the standard Part 107 knowledge test and into advanced or operational-authorization territory. Study the current rules; ignore this for exam purposes.

Comment period

The comment period closed on 2026-02-11. The FAA is no longer taking comments on this document.

This page was corrected after review.