Most remote pilots are unaffected; this creates a new voluntary restriction mechanism that facility operators can request, not a blanket airspace change.
Remote pilots who operate near fixed-site facilities (for example, critical infrastructure) that choose to file a UAFR request. Facility operators and proprietors who want to restrict drone operations near their site.
Implements section 2209 of the 2016 FAA Extension, Safety and Security Act by establishing a process for operators and proprietors of certain fixed-site facilities to request and maintain an unmanned aircraft flight restriction (UAFR). Requires applicants to demonstrate necessity for aviation safety, protection of people and property on the ground, national security, or homeland security. Also identifies which types of operations remain allowed within a UAFR.
If the rule is finalized, facilities could apply for a restriction on drone flights near them, and a granted restriction would keep drones out of that area except for the types of operation the rule allows. The abstract does not say how restrictions would be published to pilots. Unlike a TFR, a restriction would be requested by the facility rather than issued by the FAA on its own initiative. Nothing changes until a final rule is published.
Does not create a new airspace class. Does not change existing TFR procedures. Does not modify Part 107 operating rules. Does not restrict operations at facilities that do not file a request. Does not take effect until the rule is final (it is currently a proposal).
No. This is a proposed rule implementing a 2016 statute. The Part 107 exam tests current regulations, not pending proposals. You do not need to study this for your certificate.
The comment period closed on 2026-08-05. The FAA is no longer taking comments on this document.
This page was corrected after review.